メンズファッションテレビ
スーツ&ジャケットを着る男たちのためのまとめ動画サイト。毎日更新
ホーム
B.R.CHANNEL Fashion College
メンズファッション
スーツ
ジャケット
YEEZY
THE NORTH FACE
人気記事
お問い合わせ
Almost 2 million people in north-east England face new coronavirus restrictions – BBC News
2020.09.18
THE NORTH FACE
HOME
THE NORTH FACE
Almost 2 million people in north-east England face new coronavirus restrictions - BBC News
THE NORTH FACE
カテゴリの最新記事
2023.05.29
North Face Bud Lights Themselves and Gets OWNED
2023.05.28
The North Face goes full drag in new Summer of Pride campaign
2023.05.27
Sport brands #adidas #nike #puma #kappa #thenorthface #reebok #brand #realmadrid #barcelona #mancity
2023.05.26
Review Sepatu The North Face Ultra Fastpack IV Futurelight Seri Best Seller Nih
2023.05.25
The northface another woke company wtf is this how is this relevant to the outdoors 🤦🏻♂️
2023.05.24
The North Face REDBOX TEE Μπεζ NF0A2TX2LK51
Ignore lockdown rules
Ignore these lies,this is to make way for the mandatory untested DNA changing vaccine,watch this Dr talk about
whats coming for you and your kids, forward to 44:44
Corona Transition News – Actions – Support
Everything stands or falls with the “case numbers” – and this with the PCR test
Posted on August 19, 2020 by DP.
From the Corona-Transition.org editorial team.
Translation
What exactly does the test measure? And how does that work in practice? Where are any sources of error that influence the result? What must be observed in order to obtain unambiguous results?
The importance of the answers to these questions can hardly be overestimated, as they support or destroy the credibility and validity of the “case numbers”, which in turn are the main argument for all Corona measures, ordinances and controversial laws.
First of all: The PCR test for Sars-CoV-2 is almost useless if it is not used strictly in accordance with the rules.
And the very complex and correct application of the test is by no means guaranteed, and certainly not everywhere. The scientific value of the “case numbers” for an evidence-based policy is therefore low. But only an evidence-based policy is credible and communicable. In other words, a policy that is not based on evidence is arbitrary.
Corona-Transition.org will show in several chapters how this preliminary conclusion comes about – based on sources such as publicly available studies and other published works by virologists, epidemiologists and other experts. The conclusion is also supported by statements from test users at universities, hospitals or similar test facilities.
An interim remark to avoid misunderstandings: The past eight months have shown that there is something, mostly simply called “coronavirus”, that can make people sick to different degrees – and in special cases also let them die.
What does the PCR test measure?
Does he detect the presence of Sars-CoVirus-2? No. The test only measures sequences, i.e. nucleic acids that should be contained in the virus.
These sequences were identified by Chinese scientists at the beginning of the corona crisis and extrapolated in a computer model to give the “overall structure” of the virus. The virus in question has so far never been extracted from the blood of a sick person, obtained in its pure form and examined.
By the way: The very first PCR test in connection with the corona crisis was even established and proudly presented to the world before China had delivered sequences: it is Christian Drosten’s PCR test. He wrote about the test development in a scientific publication (see under ’Results’):
“Prior to announcing public virus sequences from 2019-nCoV cases, we relied on reports from social media announcing evidence of a SARS-like virus. That is why we assumed that a SARS-related CoV was involved in the outbreak. ”
(Much more about this later in the second, in the practical part)
Back to the test:
Can the test say anything about the virus, for example whether it is multiplying in the host, in us? No, or will it make people sick? No, or maybe the test says something about whether a tested person carries a small or large intact viral load. No, or has it already penetrated a cell? No, does the test say anything about the risk of infection? No.
It is therefore not surprising that the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) together with the licensing authority SwissMedic (SM) published the following document on May 20, 2020:
This is a joke. They have no tests. A back log of two weeks. Yet we are locked down again? Serco are fiddling the numbers so they get more money. Should have let the nhs test us.
Does the virus start after 10 pm while during the day it disappears?
Get ready south east, lockdown is on its way
There are no good solutions in the world. We can not do something good.
Is the English Channel having a lockdown?
Nothing about BBC salaries i see.
Anyone else get the feeling that all these mainstream media companies are almost just talking to
themselves these days? Nobody pays a blind bit of attention to their new rules or the videos they keep putting out. All we do is ignore the video, read the comments ripping the shit out this hoax, add our own comment doing the same & then move on with our lives…..not wearing a mask, in a group of more than 6 & not social distancing. This stuff is priceless 🤣😂. Honestly the whole world is starting to wake up finally & it’s a joy to see –